Setting Up A Fishing Pole Instructions

Atheism is rational? Part 1

Atheism is rational? The problems of meaning and purpose.

Copyright © April Howard Robinson April 24, 2010.

Introduction

Since time immemorial, mankind has been discussed, studied, reflected, contested, more agonizing and reflected on the question of meaning and purpose.

Humanity found a number of options to address these questions:

Religions of the world, the Apocalypse – Judaism, Islam, Christianity, Mormonism, of philosophical doubts or uncertainty – Agnosticism and atheism.

Judaism, Islam, Mormonism and Christianity are different, and claiming to have been initiated by divine revelation, not by man.

To begin, let atheism, then other options and go from there.

Atheism

An atheist is someone who does not believe or deny the existence of God or gods. This is a philosophical choice. This is a set of beliefs. Many Atheists believe that the scientific method and rational thought can not provide answers to the questions of existence and purpose. Many atheists believe in the theory of evolution and the Big Bang theory. [Emphasis added].

We thus see that atheism is something that one believes and is a philosophical choice on the basis of those beliefs.

Alternatives:

• Hinduism

Most Hindus worship a deity or deities, believe in reincarnation, the value of meditation practice and observe the public holidays and public holidays as Holi Independence Day.

Hindus believe in the law of karma: a good life now result in a better life the next reincarnation.

For Hindus the purpose of life is to attain freedom from reincarnation, but this is not guaranteed.

• Buddhism

Buddhists believe in Buddha, attained enlightenment would of thousands of incarnations.

They do not believe that this world is created and governed by a God or a god.

Beliefs Fundamental:

1.The Buddha is our only master.

2.We refuge in the Buddha, the Buddha's teaching (Dharma) and ordained monks religious or Buddhist (Sangha).

 

• Sikhism

Beliefs Basic Sikhs are summarized in the words of the Mool Mantra, the first hymn written by Guru Nanak:

There is one God. The truth is name. He is the Creator. He is not afraid. He is without hate. He is eternal and formless. It is beyond death, the Enlightened One. It can be known by The grace of the Guru (God, the Grand Master.).

It is believed that God created everything, so that life is good, but attachment to material things leads to reincarnation and suffering of birth and death. The goal of Sikhism is to end the cycle of rebirth and to be united God.

 

• Mormonism

Mormons believe the Book of Mormon which was given by Jesus Christ to its founder, Joseph Smith. They believe in a lost tribe of Israel, who settled in America.

Mormons believe that Joseph Smith is the prophet through whom the gospel Jesus Christ has been restored on earth, these days the last dispensation of the fullness of time, he said and predicted the prophets in earlier dispensations.

 

• Jehovah's Witnesses

Jehovah's Witnesses believe that Jesus was the first creation of Jehovah, then Jehovah's all right created by it.

Jehovah's Witnesses leaders say is the only visible channel of the Lord and said that the Bible can not be understood without consultation with the organization of the Watch Tower.

They estimate that 144,000 of them will be rewarded with life in the New Earth.

 

• Islam

Muslims believe the first five books of the Bible and Mohammed is the prophet of his God, Allah Many believe also that Jesus was a prophet.

All you need is to believe and recite the Shahada: "There is God but God and Mohammed is his prophet. "

For a Muslim, the purpose of life is to live in a way that is enjoyable God that we can win the Paradise. It is believed that during puberty, an account of the facts of each person to open and will be used on the Day of Judgement determine his eternal destiny.

Like Christianity, Islam teaches the existence of the soul and a life transformed after physical death. They believe in a Judgement Day when mankind will be divided between the eternal destiny of Heaven and Hell.

 

• Judaism

Jews believe they are the heirs of the promise made to Abraham his father, a God's name of "I AM WHO I AM." This is the same God worshiped by Christians.

Unlike Christianity and Islam, Judaism has no official religion or universal doctrinal requirements for membership. Good deeds and mitzvot, (613 commandments contained in Torah or Five Books of Moses) beliefs are not the most important Jewish religious life. In addition, the term "Jew" can be used to describe a race and culture rather than religion.

However, the Torah and Talmud have much to say about God, humanity, and the meaning of life.

 

• Theism

It is the belief in the existence a god or gods, especially the belief in a personal God as creator and ruler of the world. Theism in the broadest sense is belief in at least a deity. In a more specific sense, theism refers to a particular doctrine on the nature of God and his relationship with the universe.

 

• Pantheism

Pantheism literally means "God is everything." He believes that everything is part of a All-encompassing immanent God. In the pantheism of the universe and nature are equivalent to God.

It is the belief that the universe is divine and should be respected. Pantheism identifies God with the universe, but denies any personality or the transcendence of God

• Agnosticism

Belief that it is impossible to know if there is one God.

Skepticism about the existence of God, but do not profess true atheism. An agnostic does not deny the existence of God and heaven, but argues that can not be sure it exists or not.

 

• Christianity

This is not a religion. Is this a revelation and a relationship with God through faith in Jesus. God revealed to Abraham, Moses, the prophets and finally through His Son, Jesus. The Christians believe that Jesus is fully man and fully God, the Father and the Holy Spirit. Jesus said that faith in Him is the only way to God. Christians believe that Jesus lived a perfect life without sin and was crucified for the sins of mankind and rose from the dead. Faith in Jesus as Savior and God gives forgiveness and His perfect life for the believer.

 

What about religion?

Religion is a belief and respect for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and ruler of the universe.

Religion can also be a personal or institutionalized system based on this belief and worship.

Religion, by definition, is the man in search of God god or gods.

One could say that the same reasons to reject other religions should be applied to your own as a test of authenticity and truth. Religion is an example of the truth that man is naturally inclined to believe and worship. Even atheism is a belief, the belief that God does not exist. A form of religious "cult" may be slightly extended to sports goods and people, to name a few.

Thus we see that are many religions in opposition to atheism. Most of them are well developed and seems very rational and reasonable. No, however, helps us to the question. "Is atheism rational For this we must delve into the origins of the universe and life, etc.

In First, some quotes:

According to Seneca the Younger (4 BC-65 AD). "Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the leaders of the utility. "

It is undeniable truth in this statement. People do not respect religions in the Eastern religions in particular true even in our society today many people are skeptical who regard religion as false and irrelevant. The sages of reason in religion is false because it is an attempt to reach God or god (s) a man of ideas and efforts. If there is a God or a god, by definition, it could be known only to the extent they wish to be.

Blaise Pascal said: "Men do not commit evil so fully and joyfully as when they do it with conviction religious. "This has been true in many cases the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition to Oliver Cromwell. Jesus gave a very simple test:" By their fruits ye shall know them "and" a good tree will not bear bad fruit. "The main result of a true believer is love and it is impossible that these and even hatred (eg, love) that these acts could be called love. People have used religion as a lever for their own evil agenda.

Epicurus (341-270 BC) had an argument difficult and conventional non-existence of God: "God Is he willing to prevent evil, but can not, right? It is therefore not prepared omnipotent. Are you able, but? Is evil. Are you ready? Then where does evil come from? Can not can or want? Then why call him God? "

This reasoning is very Epicurious convincing. Their logic is impeccable. It was obvious that he believes unequivocally that there is no God and to demonstrate their sets belief. Is it wise right? It is not rational if there exists a reasonable doubt. We need only look around the world with an open mind have a reasonable doubt. Romans 1 verse 20 says, "since the creation of the world His invisible attributes God – his eternal power and divine nature – have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been done, so that men are without excuse. "

Epicurus believes in evil. He said that God does not exist because evil exists. It is not rational. If evil exists, then it is probable that God exists. Evil exists, but it is small, should not be quite the opposite.

"Is God willing to prevent evil, but can not?

This is another way to say, because it is bad and God is too weak to prevent or nonexistent. God certainly limit the harm or exceed the world.

Is it power, but do not want? Then it gets nasty.

To his eternal purposes of God has postponed the trial over evil and, in turn, allows as an alternative.

Are you ready? So where does evil come from?

If this is the case, why is it wrong? Once again, God enabled an alternative that has a bad time to stop.

Can not can or want? Then why call him God? "

He is ready and capable, but as I said, he set a time for that.

words of Epicurus bring two questions very difficult:

1) Why did God not destroy evil when it happened? My answer as I said, God would have delayed the punishment, but appointed a point in the future to cope with evil. Jesus gave the parable of the tares and wheat to explain to treat the disease had to be postponed or harm to the children of God who are in the world. At the same time God has allowed an alternative – The world (Global things in the world), the flesh and the devil.

2) Why not stop the fall?

It was the goal of a large number of children (boys) in the glory (presence) Hebrews 2 vs 10. God has the fall for not rigid robots, but gave the first free will. He warned of what would happen if he knew good and evil, he would die. At first, he later died died spiritually and physically. His children have inherited these two deaths. That is why Jesus had to die in our place.

George Bernard Shaw said: The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than sober.

This place is like "religion is the opium of the people" Karl Marx. seems to say that religious faith is intoxicating as a good dose of alcohol. There is truth here. A deeply religious person will be influenced and encouraged by their religion. This may be a false peace and false hopes that the definition Religion comes from the ideas of human and divine revelation.

A stranger said: "The philosophy is that questions can be answered in question. Religion is answers that may never be. "Religion should be able to be interviewed. There may be nothing wrong because a religion is true.

According to Gene Roddenberry: We must question the story logic to have an omniscient God Almighty, who creates faulty humans and blames them for his own mistakes.

This statement contains errors. First, human beings were not created defective. After the creation of the first people we read: "And All he saw what God had done, and it was very good "(Genesis 1, verse 31). God gave them free will and the ability to obey or disobey That there was no evidence of his guilt, but led to imperfection. God warned that he would die if there is warning. They told him disobeyed anyway.

An unknown author wrote: Two hands working can do more than a thousand clasped in prayer.

There is some truth there, and Jesus warned not to be too mind celestial or Earth would be futile. Instead, there are things you can do not do physical work, but prayer alone, and salvation, healing, deliverance, help and advice and much more. The Bible teaches us the value of work or actions arising from the faith "good brothers What me, if a man says he has faith but has no deeds? Faith Can save? If a brother or sister is naked and daily food. If one of you says, "Go, I wish you good luck, keep warm and well fed, but does nothing for his physical needs, what good? Similarly, faith, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead. "(Jacques 2 verse 14 to 17)

I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world – Richard Dawkins.

I agree that religion can cause this problem. On the other hand, Christianity is a revelation and not a religion, we gave the first scientists, some prominent and Mendel (genetics) and Newton (Physics) also presented the men as William Wilberforce, who campaigned to abolish slavery effectively.

Aldous Huxley said: "The facts not cease to exist because ignored. "

I agree! The problem is that certain evidence is misunderstood by ideology or philosophy that "the facts" to support the ideology or philosophy.

Said William Drummond that does not reason is a bigot, you can not reason is a fool, he who dares not reason is a slave.

Very good.

How to see by faith is to ignore Benjamin Franklin told the reason.

This may be true of religion, but not the case with the revelation. Before I was a Christian, my feelings were so longer guided my decisions and behavior. Now is the faith that guides me most. This faith can not be exercised unreasonably. If I do not use my right, then it will probably all sorts of errors or possible danger.

In 1988, Tenzin Gyatso, fourteenth Dalai Lama said: "We must study and then accept the results. If they resist not to experimentation, Buddha's own words must be rejected. "

The easy confidence with which I know man of another religion is folly teaches me to suspect that mine too, "said Mark Twain.

In reality, it is difficult beliefs to control the intensity, depth, and the indifference with which to examine other religions. This statement is true and informative. Religion is crazy if he is, as I have defined it, the man in search of God's man.

I believe in myself – that's enough. I think in this life, beautiful and unique! I believe in science! I have faith in reason. No need to prove they do not believe it! I believe the human race! I'm sure you'll start to see the true light, light of knowledge! Richard says Phillip.

The first statement is similar to the first fault, where the first people I wanted to be "like God". Belief in science is good, provided it is limited to how and why. This statement is not wise because he speaks with words of faith and belief, unless you have a solid base, defy reason and rational thought. Knowledge can lead to arrogant pride and thoughts of superiority. Knowledge does not mean better behavior. The caricature of the evil genius is widely used as a credible character in many books and films with good reason. Instinctively, see knowledge as amoral, but also as a powerful tool in the hands of a bad person. The Bible says that knowledge can be proud and show that love can build. The last statement is the blind faith in humanity, it is wrong. Throughout the world there is still corruption, extortion of funds, abuse of power, hatred, violence and greed. Yes, there are also good, but the human race has not improved and shows no sign of improvement. Technology, learning and improving the living standards of others, we have not been changed for the better.

The origin everything.

Atheism is the view that the universe has emerged by chance by a series of random events. Expressed very elegant in the Big Bang theory. Another theory, once proposed, is the theory of equilibrium.

If the universe was really by accident is it rational to expect that the laws of physics, the complex structures of atoms, molecules, systems Solar and galaxies for all accidents random? The alternative to chance is an intelligent design. Consider these three, from the state theory equilibrium.

Steady state theory

Basically, it says that the universe has always existed, just as it is now, with the material continuously forms. This does not matter what comes or, more importantly, where all the matter in the world of wine first. It is irrational to say "The universe is here, which has always been here. "Unfortunately, the theory steady state does not respect the most fundamental principles of a scientific theory, ie there must be evidence and made from the theory. Basically, the second law of thermodynamics tells us that the universe has a beginning (when the disease was zero) to challenge the Steady State theory.

 

The Big Bang Theory

In Firstly, the theory

The theory of Big Bang is the scientific explanation of how current which the universe came into existence. According to the theory of an extremely dense and hot ball of matter, very small diameter, exploded, the creation of hydrogen and helium, and lay the groundwork for later developments in the field. This should be enough material for thousands of millions of galaxies each containing hundreds of millions of stars. In theory, the new expanded area, has created a space. It is believed that the Big Bang occurred about 10 to 20 million years and that the universe is expanding and cooling.

The scientific point of view the most popular is that there is a singularity in the first place – that the laws of physics break down. Initially, the proposal of the universe with a singularity in the density of the universe and the curvature of space-time would have been endless. Because all known laws of physics break down under these conditions is a serious problem for science. Science is therefore unable to describe or predict the initial conditions and how the universe began. Is it fair to say that from the beginning that The Big Bang Theory does not God, because nobody has been able to tell what happened in the first fraction of a second child.

The evidence given by the Big Bang – expanding universe

For the Big Bang is correct, the universe must be expanding outwards from the center of the explosion.

Evidence of this expansion is given in the form of redshifts of galaxies and quasars.

When a celestial object moves away from us the light emitted must be accelerated. But the speed of light is constant in the universe can not change, therefore, the wavelength changes to red. Because the spectrum of elements such as hydrogen is called the "red shift" may go so measured. (For example, when excited, hydrogen gas emits light in four different colors in the visible spectrum, and a number of lines in the infrared and ultraviolet).

The redshift of light from galaxies has been found proportional to brightness and brightness was seen as a measure of its distance. It appears that the galaxies are from us faster than they are away from us. Well Naturally, this makes the assumption Brightness is a measure of distance and speed outside of us is the only cause shifts toward the red.

Consider the evidence.

To quote Stephen Hawking: "I was interested in the question of whether there has been an explosion in the Big unique because it is crucial to understand the origin of the universe. In collaboration with Roger Penrose, have developed a new set of mathematical techniques to solve this problem and others problems. We showed that general relativity is correct, a reasonable model of the universe must start with a singularity. This would that science could predict that the universe must have had a beginning, but he could not predict how the universe should begin: for a call God. "

The Big Bang Theory is just that, a theory. The facts that have been used to verify that it can be an error. For example, quasars and galaxies with redshifts are thought to show that the universe is expanding and has been an explosion. Forever seen the results of an explosion? To achieve the world we know of the explosion of the Big Bang is like an explosion in a home because of neatly stacked bricks, glass and mortar with the rest of the content well organized and cataloged.

Stars of certain mass explode and produce a "supernova." The problem with most mass exceeds a threshold (and the mass of the universe is certainly above this level) we know we will become a black hole that is certainly not going to explode. Thus, the theory of Big Bang has the right problem at the beginning of the universe – No "Bang!"

The second law of thermodynamics that disorder or "entropy" of the universe increases with time. This means that space, time and matter have always existed, but emerged when the entropy is zero. As already mentioned, the universe has a beginning. It also means that, by causing an explosion of galaxies and solar systems should be imposed on this fundamental law of the second law of thermodynamics, physics also shows that the universe may have existed only for a finite time. Otherwise, the universe today would have degenerated into a state of complete disorder, in which all would be at the same temperature.

colliding galaxies, which goes against the theory of an expanding universe. Our own galaxy is on a collision course with our closest neighbor, the Andromeda galaxy. Although the same age as the Milky Way, observations Hubble showed that the halo stars in Andromeda is much younger than the Milky Way. From this and other evidence, astronomers infer that Andromeda has already clashed with at least one another galaxy.

We expect that galaxies are scattered randomly throughout the universe. Instead, they are often in clusters, which are in turn parts of larger structures called superclusters. " If Big Bang actually happened there would be a more uniform material. And if the galaxies, although unlikely, has been formed, they move away from each other, not conflict. In addition, if the universe is expanding for billions of years, why not see a big "hole" where the center of the explosion was?

We can convert matter into energy, in exceptional circumstances, such as the production of a critical mass of a radioactive substance, which has an unstable nucleus, but we can not create matter. We need more intelligence and more technology we have to do things. Would lack the intelligence and capabilities of a "God" to provide energy, how in the field, ignoring the law entropy and organized in galaxies.

The "Quantum" theory proposes that the gap has become pairs of particles and anti-particles and energy to the large amount of matter in the universe has been "borrowed" from the gravitational energy. This resembles to a proposed circular, robbing Peter to pay Peter. When you make a large quantity of the same amount of antimatter would be made. Where did they all?

So where all the matter to come? The theory does not answer this question or change of status of matter in our universe came from somewhere. It is easier and more rational to believe that God put him there and at the same time, account Because of the laws of physics.

 

changes Red galaxies and quasars.

In the center of our spiral galaxy with a large amount of energy is generated with occasional flashes of light. Based on the immense gravity would be necessary to explain the motion of stars and the energy released, Astronomers conclude that, in the center of our galaxy is a supermassive black hole.

In the 1960's were observed objects emit radio waves and thought they were stars. The spectra were very unusual. He finally realized that the ghosts were so strange, because the lines are shifted toward the red by a very large amount, which corresponds to speeds away from us were important fractions of the speed of light.

The reason I took the time to reach this conclusion because these objects were thought to be relatively close stars, no one had reason to believe that far from us at such speeds.

 

The current model of a quasar has a twist Supermassive Black Hole at the center. This action produces a torsional vortex of space "by making the gas flow a spiral motion toward the hole. These gas streams collide because of the enormous gravitational energy and create heat. This gives the high luminosity quasar. It emits as much energy as an entire galaxy. Current research suggests that the implosion of a star mass of about 100 million times the mass of the Sun, could form a black hole massive enough to power a quasar.

 

Quasars are considered among the remote objects can be observed. Are thought to be distant because of their enormous gap toward the red. As the redshift of quasars is considered the speed to medium and then the equivalent distance. In an explosion of the dispersion components travel at different speeds. At one point the most rapid components are further from the center of the explosion. Therefore, we think the Red Quasar changes are evidence of the Big Bang explosion. But gravity also causes a red shift. A supermassive black hole is "super-massive" gravity and surely produce a great "Massive" redshift. While quasars are not traveling as fast as their redshifts, and suggests that perhaps not as far as expected. As mentioned above, were first thought to be close, maybe.

As we have said, there is a supermassive black hole in the center of our galaxy. If the galaxies have central black holes, then each black hole probably contributes significantly to move to the red galaxy. Adding this to the fact that there are galaxies that comes the question Big Bang theory. For example, there are hundreds of galaxies, including Andromeda, who come to us (with the changes in blue).

Suppose the blue shift galaxies have black holes at the center, causing a redshift – and it is very likely. This means that galaxies blue Blue Shift real change because the movement is more than we've observed and faster than previously thought. In addition, if the color changes from red galaxies and quasars are significantly due to the gravity the black hole, the universe is probably not extended. Of course, this is all very hypothetical, but it does cast doubt on the Big Bang. I'm not an astrophysicist, but I think there are flaws in the Big Bang. In addition, supporting the theory can be too theoretical, including matter and antimatter, you can get too theoretical to be a realistic solution to the problem that the universe came.

 

For the Big Bang is correct, the huge explosion must be organized into atoms, molecules, stars, galaxies, planets and living things, against the second law of thermodynamics. This is a huge leap of "faith" -. Take the atoms, for example, each atom has an orbital discreet or discrete set of orbital electrons. A maximum of two electrons occupy the first layer (1S). Up to 2 electrons occupy the next orbit (2S), with six (2P) that make up the second layer. Up to 18 electrons occupy the next shell (3S, 3P, 3D) and 8 occupy the next layer (4s and 4p) and so on. It is interesting to note that the 3d orbital is filled after Orbit 4S, which has a slightly lower energy. This always happens as the electrons fill the orbitals along the periodic table of elements. Sometimes orbital "hybridization" but it is always the same way with the same number of electrons to fill the orbitals. Electrons not in the ring orbits, but the clouds of probability. If a collision of gamma rays with an energy gain of electrons and can move in a higher orbit, before the equivalent of "light" between the state of the orbital energy and wine. What makes the electrons behave like that? For all we know, not only the attraction of the core work. It's incredible, if you think they do. There more than reasonable chance of design here!

What about the passage of quasars and galaxies? Quasars spin so fast that the revolution takes only a few hours. Where is the angular momentum coming from? When the sun and the earth rotation and the rotation of our solar system come from? An explosion is not the answer. It takes a lot of "faith" to believe that the universe came through random processes from scratch and the evidence we have seen, this belief is not rational.

 

To, Intelligent Design Finally

We have briefly discussed the "design" of atoms. This is not the design in the air we breathe. Nitrogen is good for our lungs and it is Interestingly, despite the loss of our planet, our atmosphere, including the inert gases, remains a constant 21% oxygen, 78% nitrogen, around 1% inert gases and traces of water vapor and carbon dioxide. No air composition has changed to a height of about 10,000 meters. It is no accident.

The current theory is that the Earth was formed from a dark nebula – a cloud gas and dust, without a star. Genesis chapter 1, verses 1 and 2 says: In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. "Now The earth was formless and empty, darkness was upon the face of the abyss, and the Spirit of God hovered over the waters. "Instead of "Fairy tales for simple people" is a good description of a dark nebula.

"The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no good and evil, no, nothing more than blind pitiless indifference. "Richard Dawkins.

It is an assessment rather bleak. Hay (creo! And hope that we were seeing) a strong evidence for design. The laws of physics, gravity is not a constant speed of light and becomes red. There are galaxies and the sun with the planets. The moon is only the size and distance because of an eclipse Total. This is not the point of boiling and freezing point of water. Water is densest at 4 ° C. If it was not If the fish from freezing. The meteorological conditions permit land and water to exist as gases, liquids and solids ..

Do not you know that the earth is the right distance from the sun? (Approximately 91 to 94,500,000 miles) closer would be too hot again and freeze to death.

In atoms, while the strong nuclear force and weak nuclear force were slightly different value, life could not exist.

Quote: "The strong nuclear force determines the extent to which the protons and neutrons (some components of atoms) to paste.

- If the strong nuclear force was slightly higher (0.3% higher) life would be impossible because all the protons and neutrons together. Only Articles were heavy in the universe.

- If the strong nuclear force was slightly lower (2%) would life

impossible because the protons and neutrons do not stick.

A single element, hydrogen can exist in the universe. "Copyright Back 1994 by God, PO Box 159, Carnation, WA 98014.

Therefore, if the proportion of the strong nuclear force and weak nuclear force varies slightly in the wrong direction, while the hydrogen and heavy elements formed. Therefore, no carbon, no life. Or not sun! I would say that the evidence for design. At least there is a high probability! There are also purpose – to sustain life on earth and provide an environment to meet our Creator.

By all means we will have an open mind, but not so open minded that our brains are leaving – Richard Dawkins.

I totally agree with being open-minded, if that does not mean, "you must believe what I believe" because it would be irrational. I totally agree that we must use our brains, which are, after all, a gift from God.

 

The Origin of Life

There are two main theories about the origin of life.

1. Organic life came into force from components dead, inorganic. There was no design or purpose. We are all descendants of that first ancestor unicellular. That is why the fish. Fish amphibians. Reptiles came from amphibians. Parmi les reptiles, les mammifères sont arrivés.

2. God created life with the design and purpose.

Consider the evidence.

Atheism and science can not satisfactorily explain the origin of life. Scientists have made a soup of amino acids, but it's a million miles from unicellular organisms.

Oparin proposed a theory that life on Earth developed through gradual evolution of molecules of carbon-based chemicals in a primordial soup that could be creating an atmosphere free of oxygen through the action of sunlight. He suggested that the "Spontaneous generation of life" has happened once, but now it was impossible because of conditions found in the primitive earth had changed, and the presence of living organisms consume no body immediately spontaneous generation. Suggested that organic molecules are combined so more and more complex to form droplets of trouble.

According to Wikipedia: coacervates are known to Alexander Oparin proposed as crucial in the first theory of abiogenesis (origin of life). This theory assumes that ends metabolism in the replication of information, against the modern understanding, and for decades the theory of Oparin was the main topic of the question on origin of life. Coacervates measured by 1 to 100 micrometers, have osmotic properties and spontaneously from dilute solutions of certain organic. Its name derives from the Latin coacervare, which means "to achieve or group." Although it was suggested that, once they have played an important role in the evolution cells and, therefore, life itself, this approach is now mostly abandoned.

 

In Miller-Urey experience a significant reduction in the gas mixture, methane, ammonia and hydrogen was used. based organic molecules like amino acids formed. Less gas reduction and low-yielding variety. One may wonder if the mixture notthe gases used in his experiment actually represents the primitive Earth atmosphere. The question is, where 21% of the oxygen of today if not just always been there? It was once thought that a reasonable amount of oxygen was present in the primitive atmosphere, before "life" began, but it would have prevented the formation of organic molecules. As mentioned earlier, something about the earth maintains the current mix of gases in the air. It is therefore likely that this composition has always been.

Given the way the prebiotic soup is mentioned in many discussions on the origin of life as a reality already established, it is a kind of shock to realize there is absolutely no positive evidence of their existence. Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Adler and Adler, 1985 261.

DNA abbreviation of deoxyribonucleic acid and is found in all living beings. The formation of complex molecules like long chain DNA "soup of amino acids" is not simple. The addition of amino acids in the Miller-Urey experiment had high concentrations of chemicals that have prevented the conversion of short chain (monomers) to long chain molecules (Polymers). An equally important challenge of the theory is relatively simple because the amino acids become complex long chain molecules in water. This is because water molecules in a long chain promote the reaction with water (hydrolysis) out of their small molecules constituencies (monomer) instead of the loss of water (condensation) to convert various monomers in polymers. Therefore, production The DNA from naturally occurring amino acid in water is chemically impossible.

 

Another blow to spontaneous generation in the field of chirality.

A chiral molecule has no plane of symmetry and its internal mirror image can not be superimposed. The most common cause of chiral molecules is the presence of an atom of carbon atoms adjacent are not symmetrical. A chiral molecule can exist in two forms, distinguished by the direction that rotates the polarized light – towards the right or left. These glasses "isomers" are called for left-and right-handers.

Two optical isomers a generic amino acid, from Wikipedia:

To take a familiar example, let's look on glucose and fructose. These have an identical composition of atoms in each molecule, but are isomers optical face.

Fructose is a sugar sweet, in many fruits. It takes the body time to break down fructose, which is in a slow release sugar, instead of once. For this reason it is used for diabetics.

In contrast, glucose provides quick energy to the body, the body use the sugar in the cells of energy.

Although its chemical formula is the same so different. Clearly then, if the optical isomers is concerned, the "fairness" is extremely important for its biological function.

To be correct, the theory of spontaneous generation of inorganic chemicals must explain the fact that all building blocks in living organisms have the same "fairness". Are left-handed amino acids and sugars of nucleic acids, ribose and deoxyribose is right.

 

Single optical isomers may be made, but must be a chiral isomer of origin or a chiral catalyst rather a 50/50 mixture of two isomers occurs. This is called a racemic mixture.

Recognizing the impossibility in nature, it has been suggested that this type of chiral source may have come from space or polarized light has the power to destroy one of the isomers. It was shown that beta particles (electrons) caused the breakdown of D-leucine in a racemic mixture. Large amounts of carbon 14 is currently proposed for it.

 

This is all highly speculative, with IFS but too many. What is clear is that correct isomers for life, if it occurs naturally, what we have seen is very unlikely to be produced in quantities of isomers bad. This could not lead to "life".

There are five major nitrogenous bases of nucleic acids DNA and RNA. These are adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine and uracil.

In the last nail in the coffin was found that although adenine and guanine require freezing conditions to form, cytosine and uracil require boiling temperatures – four out of five components of DNA and RNA can not form together naturally.

DNA is a very complex program. Not enough information encoded in a single cell to cover a large library. Although the information involves intelligence work, atheism has to believe that DNA is completely happen by accident, not design without a creator. It receives orders of magnitude more faith to believe that God is the developer of DNA.

To cite www.allaboutscience.org:

DNA is a double stranded molecule that is twisted into a helix, a spiral staircase. The four bases that make up the staircase of the spiral staircase are adenine (A), thymine (T), cytosine (C) and guanine (G). These measures should act as the "letters" in the genetic alphabet, combining into complex sequences to form words, sentences and paragraphs that act as instructions to guide the formation and functioning of the cell. The A, T, C and G in the genetic code of the DNA molecule can be compared "0" and "1" in binary code as the software to a computer and software such as computer code DNA transmits information to the cell. The sequencing and operation of the code is extremely complex, more complex than the space shuttle. However, it is important to realize that the physical basis of a message is independent of the transmitted information. In other words, the chemical elements have nothing to do with the origin of the complex message. This is a very specific message unique to each organization. While, when is the message?

To cite www.bibliotecapleyades.net :

In the molecule of human DNA, they found something very unexpected, exquisite "language" consisting of some 3 billion genetic letters. DNA actually stores information detailed instructions for assembling proteins. The information contained in human DNA is roughly the equivalent of 12 sets of the Encyclopedia UK, an incredible 384 volumes.

The only types of communication are considered high-level human languages, computer languages and artificial as the Morse code and the genetic code. No other communication system has been found to contain the basic functions of a language. These languages can not reasonably be understood as products intelligence.

DNA contains a large complex of dual digital 4 characters. Anyone who has tried programming computer (which is much simpler), we know how easy it is to make mistakes and have a program that does not work. How difficult would it be, even for a programmer rights for billions of variations of amino acids law. As mentioned previously, this type of high-level information was found that only come from an intelligent source. It must also be said that the source is very accurate and precise.

Accuracy this genetic language is such that the average error is not detected turns out to be a mistake for 10 billion letters. If an error occurs in one of the most important code, which is in the genes, can cause a disease like sickle cell anemia or even death. However, even Typing the best and smartest in the world could not get close to what one error per 10 billion letters, much less. Is it rational to believe it all came from an accident of chance?

The mechanism of DNA copying, to comply with maximum efficiency, requires the number of letters in each "word" must be an even number. All mathematically possible combinations, the ideal number for storage and transcription was estimated to be four letters. That is exactly what was found in the genes of every living being on earth, a numerical code four letters. The probability of this happening by chance must be so small that it is virtually impossible.

One of the discoverers the genetic code, Francis Crick, after decades of work in the deciphering, admitted that "an honest man, armed with all knowledge available today, can not say that in a sense, the origin of life appears at present to almost a miracle so many are the conditions that must be met to get it going "(Life Itself, 1981, p. 88).

Do not need much the thought of seeing a lot more than natural processes would be required for the period of the great difference in the chemistry and the complexity of the shape of DNA that contains billions of encoded amino acid, and then using DNA to form a living cell.

The origin of life from inorganic molecules is so unlikely that some extraterrestrial origins have been proposed – the delivery of objects (eg, chondrites carbon) or by the gravitational attraction of organic molecules or primitive forms of life in space, but it still does not answer the question of life has come.

 

Each cell is a very efficient factory, not a drop of protoplasm simple as was believed at the time of Darwin. Instructions on how to create, implement, and repair living cells has enormous 12000000000 bits of information (about). Such information can never result from a natural process. There is always the result intelligence.

Bubbles is entirely made up of molecules such as proteins, called microspheres, are formed spontaneously under appropriate conditions. But this is not a likely precursor to the modern cell membrane, such as cell membranes are composed primarily of lipid compounds rather than compounds amino acid

Even if the right chemicals in proper conditions for "spontaneously" produce life that does not that in this way. But as we have seen, nobody has been able to generate life in a test tube, even with our knowledge detailed chemistry. The natural evolution of life present in the elements is impossible and improbable. Not only that, building blocks using the same fact did synthesized a "prototype cell," I would like to have the necessary properties of life.

 

The Theory of Evolution

Definition: A theory of biological evolution developed by Charles Darwin and others, stating that all species organisms arise and develop through natural selection of small variations and inherited mutations that increase the body's ability to compete, survive and reproduce. In theory, this is an evolutionary process in which something changes into a different and often more complex or more. Implicit in theory is the principle of uniformity. Uniformitarianism states that everything on earth is the same as now. In other words, according Uniformitarianism, There have been no large-scale natural disasters on earth.

Justin Brown – If the Bible is wrong to tell us where we come from, how can we believe what we say we're going right? If an error is enough!

You can not be healthy, well educated and disbelieve in evolution. The evidence is so strong that any sane, educated person has to believe in evolution. – Richard Dawkins.

This is a radical statement! As we will see that there is no evidence to support this statement. In addition, it is matter of faith or "not believing" it is not necessarily something to do with education.

Is it absolutely safe to say that if you know someone who claims not to believe in evolution, this person is ignorant, stupid or insane (or bad, but I do not consider that.) Richard Dawkins.

Is his condition? Is it science? People are talking, essentially, say "agree with me, mine is the only point of view intelligently." Do not misunderstand the tone and content of this shows the passion. However, it is a surprising statement overconfidence. The word "believe" in the context of evolution is correct, because it is a belief not facts.

Look at the theory of sound as honestly and as bias unless we can muster. Evolution is designed as a scientific theory. We will apply the scientific method to this?

The steps of the scientific method are:

1. Note.

2. Construct a hypothesis that is consistent with observation.

3. Use the hypothesis to make predictions.

4. Test the predictions of experiments or further observations and modify the hypothesis in light of the results.

5. Repeat Steps 3 and 4 until there are no discrepancies between theory and experiment and / or observation. (A hypothesis becomes a theory when there is a consistency).

Darwin observed variation within species. He also noted that some species are interdependent. For example, clover needs bees. He also noted that the fossils were found in different strata, with simple animals and plants that are below.

This concludes that of all animals and plants that are now coming from a common ancestor less developed and developed to its present state by mutation and natural selection (evolution). He knew nothing of genetics and DNA and, like evolution, the mutation was impossible.

When you use the scientific method was to step 4 above and make additional comments. He made many observations and raw data size excellent. This is not the problem. Their conclusions beyond their observations.

Concluded that evolution had taken place even though it had no comments to support. There was a gradual evolution from one species to another in the fossil record. The absence of fossil evidence of transitions and lack of linkages and annoyed he said.

However, he contented himself with the consolation that had not been found, however, and everything would be fine, when more fossils were discovered. Very optimistic, but this is not science! And note that the language and reasoning of evolution is in the vein of a system of faith or belief.

Evolution gives no support for the way the first creatures unicellular was not. As we have seen, spontaneous generation is impossible. Without a viable cause or means of life began partly by chance or accident, the evolution of the falls at the first hurdle.

As we Having a good quality of the information exists in the cells of every living organism. The instructions are written with grace and precision in a language that has a "Alphabet" "Grammar" and the meaning.

Evolution tells us that, through random mutations and selection natural living things evolve. This means that organizations must undergo gradual changes until it turns into another species. This can be done by changing the DNA code. As we have seen, an error of 10 billion (1 in 10 million) can cause serious health problems, or kill an organism.

Abnormality in the DNA of an individual is a condition known as a genetic disorder. Anomalies can range from a small mutation in a gene to the addition or deletion of an entire chromosome or set of chromosomes.

single gene disorder is the result of a single gene. It is estimated that more than 4000 human diseases caused by monogenic diseases. monogenic diseases can be transmitted to subsequent generations. It is the opposite of the proposed pass-through mutation.

A mutation known is hemophilia, a group of hereditary genetic diseases alter the body's ability to control blood clotting or bleeding when a blood vessel ruptures.

The mutations cause a disability, illness or death. Look for spina bifida and thalidomide. Just think for a minute. If the mutation is of evolution, why not see how when people are exposed to gamma rays or radioactive substances? The answer is that the mutations caused an injury or death. Not lead to improvement. The development means that most mutations are a success. In fact, the vast majority are very little success.

DNA damage can lead to dysfunction of cells, cancer, aging of cell death, and other diseases. This is not the cystic fibrosis, hypothyroidism, colon cancer, breast cancer, cancer ovarian cancer, Alzheimer's disease and sickle cell anemia, one of the most common genetic diseases in the United States.

Fortunately, most of us who repair pathways of DNA that the investigation of DNA and correct errors. Not bad for an accident happy, right?

UV mutation causes skin aging and excess can cause burns or cancer. In a extreme case, a family whose repair gene has been inactivated by mutations. Blisters and burns in the sun and the high incidence of cancer in the family.

Therefore, the mutation is not a viable means of evolution.

DNA is a comprehensive program that is possible is an adaptation of a species. In fact, evidence of adaptation suggests that this service was provided in all that Darwin observed finches – adaptation – finches remained roughly the same size but different peaks, which were adapted to different food sources.

Another player in the evolution of nature. Darwin receives faith in amazing omnipotence and wisdom of nature. He really believed in him. He believed that nature can anticipate and manage the needs of an organization and interaction between different agencies.

It is irrational to deny the existence of God but to nature "God" like qualities.

I have a question: If the earth is hundreds of millions of years, why is the oldest tree of thousands of years only?

The oldest recorded tree in the world 9550 years pine in the province of Dalarna in Sweden.

The oldest living tree "Methuselah" is 4768 years old and grew up in California, USA.

Prometheus was the nickname given to the oldest known Great Basin Bristlecone Pine, who had grown Wheeler Peak in eastern Nevada, USA. The tree was probably equal to or more than 5000 years old when cut in 1964

King Clone is thought to be as old ring of scrub in the Mojave Desert. At an average diameter of 45 meters and reaches up to 67 feet in diameter. An estimated 11,700 years old, perhaps the oldest living organism on Earth.

The fact is that the age of these plants to infer that the age Earth is in the tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of years.

Another question: If the evolution of happened, why aging occurs, as pre-programmed into every living cell? We expect the "body" you want as a Life can pass on their genes as much as possible. (This is the kind of statement made by Darwin amazing organisms not only giving intelligence and vision, but also the power to change for the better. Since humans evolved from the so-called higher organisms "are incapable of that, the rest the least developed of the "organs" have no chance.) as well as aging, are the reason why all animals and plants subject to the death and rot? This can not be explained by evolution. This is explained by the fall (Genesis 3).

Another question. If man is "more evolved" agencies not surprising that our babies are so helpless, they need intensive nutrition compared certain "less evolved" organisms that can fend them shortly after birth or born? Why do we need clothes? Why do we need to sterilize your food and purify our drinking water? All other organisms eat raw foods, some can even drink water stagnant, with no adverse effects.

Consider the evidence of evolution:

 

The conditions necessary for fossils.

All animals are easily consumed by other animals. Even bones can be eaten by carnivores and bacteria. Unsurprisingly, the formation of intact fossil is very rare in normal conditions. This is particularly true as we are told that the forms of sediment at a rate of only one inch per year. At this rate it would take centuries to bury a dinosaur (if there was nothing left to bury!)

Instead of finding fossils consumed and worn fossils are nearly complete. Some dinosaur fossils impressions were of the skin – not the kind of thing that was expected if only 1 inch of sediment per year is deposited in them. Obviously were covered quickly. Due to decay and scavengers and the need for burial to coincide with when they had died is a very strong chance that they were not dead, but alive when buried. The fossil remains of clams support this initiative, which was found in the closed position, indicating that they were buried alive. sedimentary layers and fossils appear to be witnessing a cataclysm seafaring past.

In addition, held that the fossils are very rare, we find that are very abundant. There are hundreds of millions of fossils, all cataloged and identified, in museums around the world. All the fossils found in sedimentary rocks of rock that is formed a mixture in water. Conditions conducive to the formation fossils include burial rapid in the wet sediment or other material to prevent soft tissue is eaten by collectors waste, prevent erosion and remove oxygen and bacteria, preventing decay. In other words, something like a world, floods catastrophic needed to make the fossils in the numbers found in the fossil record. sea creatures in the bottom stratum, of course, with land animals in the upper layers.

Instead of millions of years, we now know that fossil formation can occur rapidly in the right circumstances. It was found that the fossils were formed within 50 years in the delta of a river.

In Siberia, some 50 woolly mammoths and a long-horned rhinoceros were found preserved in ice, even with the skin and flesh intact. Are expected to believe that lived 10,000 to 1,600,000 years (Pleistocene). Would they have been preserved from this period of time? Maybe not. What is even more important is that something different current conditions occurred, contradicting uniformitarianism. Many of water has passed and quick frozen mammoths. mammoths preserved in ice is evidence of a flood, such as coal in North Pole (which suggests a mild climate throughout the world was changed by the loss of a canopy of water vapor). Evolution can not explain these things.

There are about 300 survivors of the flood legends handed down by ancient civilizations. Some suggest that the flood of Noah.

The fossil record

The development means there is only one way in Archives fossil may have formed. That in itself is not scientific because there is at least one other possibility. Assume that the layers were laid down by time period geological, with the oldest rocks below.

The formation of rock strata in the tens or hundreds of millions of years, all seems perfectly rational until you look at what we should expect if evolution really happened. If evolution is the cause of life on earth, so should be a great number of fossil forms of life evolved in part. For the enormous gap between cold-blooded reptiles and warm-blooded mammals must not hundreds or thousands of fossils link if evolution is true. Millions of years gradual evolution to appear in many transitional fossils.

The opposite has been found! When examining fossils are extinct and existing organizations with clearly defined spaces.

Cambrian Pliocene, the new species appear suddenly in large numbers without transitional forms leading to them. It was thought that some fossil horses had signs of evolution. This has been shown is a mistake. They were a different species anyway. Many animals in the "fossil" are alive today in much the same way that their fossils. They are part of evolution! The others are dead But death does not prove evolution and an abundance of "living fossils" certainly does not.

As we have said. very complex creatures appear suddenly in the Cambrian rocks. "Paleontologists call this immense problem" of the Cambrian explosion. " There are trilobites, brachiopods, worms, sponges, jellyfish, all without ancestors. Trilobites, for example, have a very complex system of lenses their eyes, so that not only "simple" organisms. Do not follow developments predecessors were less complex but no criminal.

Charles Darwin realized Cambrian explosion and thought it was an artifact of a poorly preserved fossil record. We now know that this was a mistake. In Moreover, many of our animals and plants are modern in the lowest level, just above the Precambrian. How

About the Author

I am interested in science and also Christianity. I like science fiction and fantasy novels. Reading is one of my favourite hobbies.

 

Fishing How To – Setting up a Basic Rod

GoPro HD Surf Hero $209.99 GoPro’s HD Surf HERO is the world’s only 1080p HD on-board video and still photo surfing camera. Professional quality 1080p / 960p / 720p HD resolutions record at 30 and 60 frames per second (60 fps in 720p). Easily mounts to any surfboard in seconds. So light, even top pros claim they don’t notice the camera on their boards. The HD Surf HERO cam can also shoot 5MP photos automatically every 2 se…

GoPro HD Helmet Hero $0.01 …

Bass Pro Shops: The Strike Bundle with Fishing Rod $23.49 Cast your line on one of ten North American lakes in this fishing game from developer Piranha Games. The Strike literally puts the fishing rod in players’ hands as they head out to their favorite hot spots, including several popular lakes in North America. By combining high-quality, advanced game play with an innovative, motion-sensing fishing pole controller, The Strike is quite the catch for gam…

Bass Pro Shops: The Strike Bundle with Fishing Rod $25.99 Cast set the hook feelthe fightProduct InformationBass Pro Shops:  The Strike Bundle with Fishing Rod bines arod and reel controller with a live-motion fishing game.  Dropanchor on your couch and fish the day away.  By pairing aninnovative rod and reel controller with an amazing fishing game for theWii you’ll have the most authentic fishing experience possible -without leaving your …

Bass Pro Shops: The Strike $7.25 Literally puts the fishing rod in the players hands as they he ad out to their favorite hot spots including several popular la kes in north america. By combining high quality advanced gamepl ay with an innovative motion-sensing fishing pole controller is quite the catch for games and outdoor enthusiasts alike….

The Strike Fishing Game PC Software $16.96 GRIFFIN INTERNATIONAL BPS7900 BASS PRO SHOP THE STRIKE…